Three Jobs Publishing Houses Need to Fill in 2010
by Ami Greko
In this era of layoffs and pay freezes across the industry, it might seem silly to talk about new positions that publishing houses should be looking to fill. I can hear you all groaning from here: with what time, exactly, should we be interviewing these people, and which pile of doubloons should we cash in to make payroll? But instead of thinking of these roles as expenses now, they should be seen as investments from publishers in their digital future, ones that will pay off in dividends in the years to come.
- The Multimedia Editor: Book lovers been talking for years about The Future, where video and audio and more—maybe video games!—will mingle with words to create a sort of uber-book. Looking at the experiments of 2009, it seems like that day is creeping ever close. The thing is, we still haven’t really figured out how to insert these assets into the text without tapping the reader on the shoulder to let her know we’ve done it. “Look! We made a video! Isn’t that better than just turning a stupid page?” The ideal scenario would be a book that flows between text and multimedia for a seamless reading experience, not one that calls attention to its assets, pulling you completely out of the narrative. Every publishing house needs editors that are skilled not at the integration of words with each other, but with the multimedia elements into the text. Experience with designing webpages full of assets a must.
- The Community Development Manager: Advice to businesses about using Twitter always emphasizes the importance of monitoring the name of your brand. For imprints, that doesn’t mean monitoring just the imprint and parent company’s name, but also all of the authors and book titles released by the imprint. That’s a lot of keywords. And this applies not only to Twitter, but to all online monitoring and engagement. It’s too big of a job to add to your already busy publicist’s plates—you need someone online full time entering the conversation and encouraging your fans. Example: there’s a huge following for Nick Harkaway’s The Gone-Away World amongst bookish Twitter-ers (Stephanie Anderson is one of the ringleaders), all of whom would be thrilled to show up at an event, pre-order the next hardcover, or help promote any new writing. Does Knopf know about it?
- The Passionate Insider: Publishing houses need to begin evaluating for jobs based on the interest level of the applicants as well as experience. Chelsea Green is a great example of what can be accomplished with a team of folks who are all truly passionate about the books they’re putting out. In the words of their blogger, Makenna Goodman: “Ours is a mission-based business, whose employees respect the lives (and values) of the authors they’re promoting. We put out books on fermentation, and make pickles at home, in other words.” While it’s true that you don’t need to be a scientist to edit Ray Kurzweil or a yoga fan to promote Elizabeth Gilbert, let’s be honest: it’s easy to see the magic that happens when people work on books that resonate with their interests. What’s more people who are engaged with the subject matter of the books they work on can brand themselves as experts in social media space, where authenticity is essential. These people are worth their weight in gold (people like Ann Kingman at Random House, or Jen Hill at Tor), and should be paid as such.
Has your house already taken the plunge and hired for any of these positions? Are there any other positions houses should be hiring for that I’ve missed?











Comments
This is SUCH a smart post. I had never thought of a Multimedia Editor, but when you say it, it makes SO much sense. I hope publishers out there heed your advice!
Great post!
Where can you get these fine folks, one might ask? It might be just a simple internal shift…
#1 – Smart person from IT
#2 – Savvy Coordinator in Publicity
#3 – EDITORIAL! After all, you live with these books day and night – embrace your niche
Excellent post! Multimedia Editor is indeed a fundamental job these days – and I myself worked as a passionate insider for a Brazilian publishing house years ago regarding science fiction. It´s a wonderful job!
Another article about publishing with a typo in it: “worth their weigh in gold.”
How about the writer have someone proofread this work before waxing prophetic on publishing?
A line editor will always be in demand.
I totally agree: usually these people are already in house–it’s just a matter of moving them into a position where you’re taking full advantage of their skills (which will likely also be, as Fabio says, a really fun job).
Thanks for pointing out the error, Michelle. It’s been corrected now. Clearly, I totally agree with you: there’s always going to be a place in publishing for all types of traditional editors.
Multi-media is definitely not just on the horizon but among us right now.
Here at Sterling Editing we’re in conversation with a second client who has a multi-media project. It’s a trickle that will be a flood, IMO. The
iUnicorniSlate will blow the doors off.[...] Three Jobs Publishing Houses Need to Fill in 2010Genius Ami Greko joins the call for new positions and new roles at modern publishing houses. Heed her words (or, if the Unicorn is announced tomorrow, are you really ready to do something about it?). [...]
And here I thought I was foolish when I searched for job titles like ‘Digital Editor’ and didn’t come up with any. Thanks for stating this need so simply.
But I disagree with Kate that the best place to find this person is IT. I think there’s a lot to be said for people who aren’t necessarily ‘tech people’ but understand the technologies and platforms and can also think like a lay user.
@tanushri Agreed! My IT recommendation was pointed towards the first ‘essential position’ – Multimedia Editor. Someone from IT may be a good choice if they’re already familiar with good audio/video editing software.
But you’re right – and I have a perfect example: I had a member of my team, with a marketing background, who is now the go-to multimedia editor for a publishing house. Doesn’t have to always be from the fix-it guys.
A really useful articulation of what is already in progress but as yet unnamed in many houses. Thank you. The way I see it, it has been and always should be the case for anyone in book publishing first that they should be passionate about the books and subject matter and second that they should try to understand all aspects of the book industry, not just their own niche within it. While most of us cannot master every aspect, it is critical to have an understanding of how the pieces of the whole fit together in order to to do your part optimally.
Oh, no, Michelle who values the line editor, please forgive double of “to” in my post. Do you think the line editor will have to work differently now that the publishing process is dramatically sped up?
@Susannah That’s something I’ve been wondering myself. Line editing to me still seems to be most accurate when done purely analog-style. But is that still necessarily true in a digital environment with so much automated?
[...] Three positions publishing houses will need to fill in 2010. It’s an interesting look at how publishers need to adapt in the digital area. Share and Enjoy: [...]
[...] 1.) There is an awesome “new” blog called The New Sleekness. It has a lovely look and very interesting publishing punditry. [...]
[...] Three Jobs Publishing Houses Need to Fill in 2010 : The New Sleekness In this era of layoffs and pay freezes across the industry, it might seem silly to talk about new positions that publishing houses should be looking to fill. I can hear you all groaning from here: with what time, exactly, should we be interviewing these people, and which pile of doubloons should we cash in to make payroll? But instead of thinking of these roles as expenses now, they should be seen as investments from publishers in their digital future, ones that will pay off in dividends in the years to come. (tags: publishing digital) [...]
I recomend that we all establish a policy of always having at least 3 typoos in every post or comment. Doing so will give editors a sense of meaning and impotance…