<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Readers Are Fickle, Learn to Embrace Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewsleekness.com/index.php/readers-are-fickle-learn-to-embrace-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewsleekness.com/index.php/readers-are-fickle-learn-to-embrace-us/</link>
	<description>Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday End of the Day Links: GetGlue Is Pretty Cool &#124; Dear Author: Romance Novel Reviews, Industry News, and Commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewsleekness.com/index.php/readers-are-fickle-learn-to-embrace-us/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday End of the Day Links: GetGlue Is Pretty Cool &#124; Dear Author: Romance Novel Reviews, Industry News, and Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewsleekness.com/?p=335#comment-255</guid>
		<description>[...] I did get invited to guest blog at The New Sleekness, Ami&#8217;s publishing blog. I blogged today about reader fickleness. Usually I don&#8217;t post these, in part because there is so much to post, but today&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I did get invited to guest blog at The New Sleekness, Ami&#8217;s publishing blog. I blogged today about reader fickleness. Usually I don&#8217;t post these, in part because there is so much to post, but today&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Massey</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewsleekness.com/index.php/readers-are-fickle-learn-to-embrace-us/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewsleekness.com/?p=335#comment-254</guid>
		<description>&gt;*how* to embrace your reader

Author and science fiction guru Jacqueline Lichtenberg has been blogging recently that one major reason the use of social networking  to market books (or any product, really) by publishers isn&#039;t a smashing success is because the publishers (often) aren&#039;t the customers of the product. It&#039;s like they enter a conversation at a party without first checking to see what&#039;s being discussed or even taking time to listen &amp; learn first before talking.

When I hear about the challenge you stated above, Ami, I immediately think of Sam Raimi and the Spider Man film franchise. I think one reason Raimi&#039;s incarnations of the webbed wonder were so successful was because in addition to being an accomplished director, he was also a fan of the source material. He knew what fans wanted but also how to deliver the blockbuster that the studio required.

Maybe one way to embrace readers is to do a Sam Raimi:  hire staff (editors, PR folks, art department, etc.) who are the customers--fans--of the books in question. Or tap into the fan base among the staff that may already exist. Or do some kind of outreach/focus group.

If publishers can engage in genuine dialogues with readers in forums and other online communities (as members &amp; fans, not marketers), that would be a start. But they&#039;d have to leave the sales pitch at the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;*how* to embrace your reader</p>
<p>Author and science fiction guru Jacqueline Lichtenberg has been blogging recently that one major reason the use of social networking  to market books (or any product, really) by publishers isn&#8217;t a smashing success is because the publishers (often) aren&#8217;t the customers of the product. It&#8217;s like they enter a conversation at a party without first checking to see what&#8217;s being discussed or even taking time to listen &amp; learn first before talking.</p>
<p>When I hear about the challenge you stated above, Ami, I immediately think of Sam Raimi and the Spider Man film franchise. I think one reason Raimi&#8217;s incarnations of the webbed wonder were so successful was because in addition to being an accomplished director, he was also a fan of the source material. He knew what fans wanted but also how to deliver the blockbuster that the studio required.</p>
<p>Maybe one way to embrace readers is to do a Sam Raimi:  hire staff (editors, PR folks, art department, etc.) who are the customers&#8211;fans&#8211;of the books in question. Or tap into the fan base among the staff that may already exist. Or do some kind of outreach/focus group.</p>
<p>If publishers can engage in genuine dialogues with readers in forums and other online communities (as members &amp; fans, not marketers), that would be a start. But they&#8217;d have to leave the sales pitch at the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Litte</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewsleekness.com/index.php/readers-are-fickle-learn-to-embrace-us/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Litte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewsleekness.com/?p=335#comment-252</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;. Part of the problem, I think, is that it’s hard to know *how* to embrace your reader when you’re a publisher who has sold to middlemen for years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is so true. For insiders, my next statement will appear laughably naive, but until 2009, I actually believed &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt; was the publisher&#039;s customer.  In 2009, I learned, through extensive re education, that the customer of the publisher is the wholesaler, retailer, bookclub buyer; seemingly anyone but the reader.  

Once I had accepted this, every statement to the press by publishers made sense, albeit not always in a good way.  I think that publishers can still sell to the retailer, to the wholesaler, to the corporate buyer while still messaging to the reader, but it seems that an internal mind shift, akin to what I underwent in 2009, will have to take place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>. Part of the problem, I think, is that it’s hard to know *how* to embrace your reader when you’re a publisher who has sold to middlemen for years.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is so true. For insiders, my next statement will appear laughably naive, but until 2009, I actually believed <em>I</em> was the publisher&#8217;s customer.  In 2009, I learned, through extensive re education, that the customer of the publisher is the wholesaler, retailer, bookclub buyer; seemingly anyone but the reader.  </p>
<p>Once I had accepted this, every statement to the press by publishers made sense, albeit not always in a good way.  I think that publishers can still sell to the retailer, to the wholesaler, to the corporate buyer while still messaging to the reader, but it seems that an internal mind shift, akin to what I underwent in 2009, will have to take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ami Greko</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewsleekness.com/index.php/readers-are-fickle-learn-to-embrace-us/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Ami Greko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewsleekness.com/?p=335#comment-251</guid>
		<description>This is great, Jane, and it&#039;s something I hope you&#039;ll be able to talk more about as a guest blogger. Part of the problem, I think, is that it&#039;s hard to know *how* to embrace your reader when you&#039;re a publisher who has sold to middlemen for years. 

I&#039;d be really interested to hear especially about how the romance publishing and writing community has worked to embrace readers, and what specifically worked and (perhaps more interesting) what failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, Jane, and it&#8217;s something I hope you&#8217;ll be able to talk more about as a guest blogger. Part of the problem, I think, is that it&#8217;s hard to know *how* to embrace your reader when you&#8217;re a publisher who has sold to middlemen for years. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be really interested to hear especially about how the romance publishing and writing community has worked to embrace readers, and what specifically worked and (perhaps more interesting) what failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
