Being Part of a Community
by Jane Litte
Lately we’ve seen a lot of encouragement for publishing folks, like the editors and marketers, to come to communities and participate. It’s a great sentiment, but I can see reluctance on the part of these people to fully engage in a reader community, or any community for that matter. Perhaps in order for the people who make publishing hum to come and share their thoughts about books, there need to be some guidelines and tips and here are a few of mine (which are by no mean exhaustive or mandatory).
From the publishing side
First, I think that each publishing house should have a set of guidelines on how to interact with a community of readers. The guidelines will help the editors and marketers have certainty regarding their behavior online so that these individuals can participate without fear of internal reprisals.
Second, the publishing house should have some kind of time set aside each day which would allow for the editor or marketer to participate in online communities whether it be message boards, blogs, twitter or facebook.
Third, the publishing house needs to allow the editors and marketers to have a personality. Readers want to interact with people, not marketing machines. People have personalities. It’s what makes them interesting.
In the community
Once the editor and marketer is allowed to be set free on the internet, I would offer these helpful tips in participating in online communities.
First, choose a community of which you actually want to be a part. In other words, that community doesn’t need to be a specific reader community. Perhaps you have great interest in knitting and would be more interested in interfacing with other knitters. I get quite a few link backs and referrals from ravelry.com. The point is to find a robust community around a topic or two that interests you the most. This way, participating in a community won’t be a chore, but a pleasure. Readers are everywhere, even at knitting sites.
Second, don’t push your books right away. At Tools of Change, one presenter said that you have to talk up other products, goods, services, etc twelve times to build credibility before you can push your own products, goods, services, etc.
Third, go with the purpose of being part of the community. If you go with the specific purpose of being part of the community instead of seeing it as a target for marketing books, then one and two fall into place. Further, your interaction in that community will be far more natural.
Fourth, don’t be afraid to toot your horn. In almost every community, there is a time to introduce yourself and make known your background. You don’t have to hide the fact that you work for a publisher. You should wear that badge proud. This way, when someone has a question about publishing or books, you are the go to person for this knowledge. (Just don’t preface every comment or post with “As an editor” or “As a marketer”. That can get old fast).
I feel like readers are always looking for recommendations and if you are part of a community and have built credibility in that community, readers will trust you and your recommendations.
Comments
[...] guest blogged at The New Sleekness about how editors and publishers could participate at a greater level in reader communities. Have you got some other [...]
What really resonated with me is this line: “The point is to find a robust community around a topic or two that interests you the most.”
This is something that will pay off repeatedly for folks. Experience in an online community that you enjoy being a part of tends to be a gateway drug, so to speak–it often makes people want to try out additional communities.
And from the POV of a publisher, it would be great to have employees who are involved in a range of communities. As you say, book lovers are everywhere, and book subjects are all over the place. It’s challenging as a publicist to try to figure out a way into a community that you haven’t got any experience with.
How cool would it be to know that you can call on the editorial assistant who loves to rock climb and represents your publisher within those communities to introduce you to the important people and sites?
This is subtle but groundbreaking stuff.
My only issue is the connection between the editor/publisher and the community.
It would seem that for every book you have to pitch, you’d need someone in the company whose genuine interests align with both the book and the community — wouldn’t this start to become unrealistic?
It seems better to have the writer interact directly with the community, and then refer them to the book. Not always easy or realistic, either, but definitely the purest connection between community and content (book).
Hmmm…
I see this as a supplement but not a replacement for the writer interaction in a community.
Thanks, Jane. That clarifies things. I look forward to your future posts. I appreciate what you’re doing.
Jane, a lingering thought: how would you suggest the publisher, author and reader all connect together in this community model?
@Charles – assuming publisher is “employee of a publisher” then I would presume that they would be participants in the larger community, exchanging comments online about various topics germane to that community, although, I think this is actually much easier in a non reader designated community.
In a self designated reader community, I think there are more pitfalls for both the editor and the publisher to be aware. For example, in a site that has reviews, an author’s presence in the comment thread about her book can stifle discussion and I would presume that would be the same for publisher representatives.
Great article… I’ve also heard that 1:12 ratio for promoting yourself in social media… And i think that makes sense, if you just promote yourself without engaging with the community than you’re pretty much a spammer.
You can not believe how long ive been googling for something like this. Through 9 pages of Yahoo results without finding anything. One search on Bing. There you are!…. Really have to start using it more often!